This
is what in sporting circles we would call a turn-up for the books. The Trudeau
Liberal party government has made official something that a year or two ago
none of us could have expected: it no longer deplores the Alberta Tar Sands as
a source of energy, and the damage they are doing to the globe, but it actively
supports them to the extent that it is investing billions and untold billions
of Canadian taxpayer’s money in ensuring that their production should be
doubled and more.
They have done so with a cavalier
disregard for other well-founded negative opinions. Did not Mr. Trudeau himself
say in a recent speech in the United States that no government could afford to
leave 173 billion barrels of oil in the ground?
And he could have added: “And to be damned with the rest of the world
and its survival! All we care about is getting rich!”
Mind you, I am not sure of this, but I
don’t think he has ever had the courage to say that to a Canadian audience, for
fear of being torn limb from limb. You know us: we are everybody’s friend, we
are the sensible nation every other nation is trying to emulate.
Our leaders never mention the shame-making mess that the
tar sands have created in northern Alberta, they act as if it doesn’t exist, so
in announcing their decision to expand the mess I suppose it is inevitable that
they should try to hide under such ludicrous euphemistic phrases as “we have to
get our resources to market, like any other country”, or “we have to defend
federal jurisdiction”, or “we don't want to give the impression to the rest of
the world that we aren’t a good place to invest in,” or, the most outrageous of
all of them, “to expand the tar sands is the cornerstone of our policy to
prevent climate change through human action,” all of these made, without, so
far as I know, any of these shameless hypocrites blushing.
I used to be critical of Elizabeth May
for playing on both sides at the same time --- working for he Mulroney government
and the Sierra Club at the same time --- but she has come up big in his
controversy, and I have to take my hat off to her. Her account of the economic
realities of this pipeline seems never to have reached the minds of our
established media, and would be enough to turn any reasonable person against
the project. In addition, according to another article I read by a dissenting
economic guy, the bitumen does not meet a ready market in Asia, as the
government claims, but is mostly destined for refineries on the American West Coast. To achieve which noble result, apparently billions
of Canadian money is to be poured out. Isn’t there something wrong with this? I
know Trudeau seems not to understand India, but I thought he had the measure of
the Americans. And yet the Kinder Morgan (a successor to Enron, according to Ms.May)
people have played him so skilfully that they seem likely to come out of it all
with a substantial profit of more than a billion dollars without lifting a
spade.
And as Bill McKibben, the U.S.
environmental activist writes
“history
will remember Justin Trudeau, not as a dreamy progressive, but as one more
pathetic employee of the richest, most reckless industry in the planet’s history.”
Way to go, Justin!
Hello Boyce, thanks kindly for the insight and perspective here. I just sent a message via Facebook regarding Willie Dunn if you have a moment. I can be reached at sipreano at g mail dot com [@gmail.com] All the best, Kevin
ReplyDelete