Wednesday, June 5, 2019

Link of the day: June 5 2019: On Equating BDS With Anti-Semitism: a Letter to the Members of the German Government, by an expert on the Middle East, that has been published by the online site Counterpunch this week

 I have been shocked in recent months to find that the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement, a response to the brutal, illegal occupation conducted by Israel over the occupied West Bank of Palestine, has been damned and condemned by most Western political leaders, .including leaders of our government, and (even the leader of Canada’s Green Party who threatened to resign if her party persisted in supporting BDS.)

Here below is a reasoned, calmly argued  letter from Dr. Sara Roy, a senior  research associate at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University, and a Jew herself, from a post-Holocaust family, urging members of the German government not to conflate political opposition to policies of the state of Israel with anti-semitism. I know this is a sensitive subject, but I think the best service I can do to my little band of readers is to offer this concise argument  by Dr. Roy, who tells these parliamentarians that their obligation  lies in holding Israel and Jews to the same ethical and moral standards that you would demand of any people, including yourselves.”

This argument reminds me of a situation in the 1960-80s following the Commonwealth decision to boycott sporting contacts with apartheid South Africa. In New Zealand, where I grew up, and lived in the mid 1970s, Conservative governments routinely either invited South African teams to tour New Zealand, or permitted New Zealand teams to visit South Africa, the argument being that politics has no place in sports. But this was more than sports: this was a means to bring down, or at least help to bring down, a brutal government whose policies were an offense to the world. The parallels are striking with the present position of Israel, which is supported by establishments across the Western world that have collaborated by complying in the growth of the apartheid occupation regime that Israel has developed over the years, along with the considerable growth in the power and wealth of the Israeli state.  

Only years later after his release did Nelson Mandela record the immense lift given to him and his fellow prisoners by the resistance mounted against a touring South African Rugby team by ordinary New Zealanders, who braved police truncheons, arrest and attack in their efforts to prevent the games from being played. Briefly, the small, peaceful country of New Zealand teetered on the edge of a civil war. Not over a Rugby tour, but in response to a boycott of an evil state, whose dictates in the selection of racially segregated teams New Zealand had been obeying for at least 40 years.

 Here is Dr. Roy’s letter:

To the Members of the German Government:
I write to you regarding the motion recently passed by the Bundestag that equated BDS with anti-Semitism. I also write to you as a Jew, a child of Holocaust survivors and as a scholar of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
My mother, Taube, and father, Abraham, survived Auschwitz among other horrors. My father was the only survivor in his family of six children and my mother survived with only one sister in a family that was larger than my father’s. I know, without question, that if they were alive today, the motion you are being asked to endorse would terrify them given the repression of tolerance and witness that it clearly embraces. I shall not restate what others have already written protesting your action, but I do have some thoughts I would like to share.
In September 2014 I was invited to speak on Gaza at the Heinrich Boll Stiftung after the terrible events of that summer. During the question period, a gentleman stood up who was quite agitated. He argued quite strongly that given Germany’s history, it is difficult if not impossible for Germans to criticize Israel. Embedded in his statement was the belief that Germans should never engage in such criticism. He seemed to insist that I accept this. I do not. Nor would my parents.
My response to him, then, is the same as my response to you now: If your history has imposed a burden and an obligation upon you, it is to defend justice not Israel. This is what Judaism, not Zionism, demands. Your obligation does not lie in making Israel or the Jewish people special or selectively excusing injustice because Jews happen to be committing it; it lies in holding Israel and Jews to the same ethical and moral standards that you would demand of any people, including yourselves. If you think that by refusing to criticize Israel’s brutal occupation — and punishing those who do — you are protecting and securing the State of Israel or the place of the Jewish people in the world, you are terribly misguided. Your approach achieves the exact opposite — by insisting on treating Jews as an exception, you are weakening us by again making us a kind of anomaly, an intruder, a negation of Europe. It makes us more vulnerable to and unsheltered from the racism and the true anti-Semitism now resurgent throughout the world.
Your sense of guilt, if that is the correct word, should not derive from criticizing Israel. It should reside in remaining silent in the face of injustice as so many of your forebears did before, during and after the Holocaust.
I lost a large extended family to fascism and racism. By endorsing the motion that alleges that BDS is anti-Semitic—regardless of one’s position on BDS—you are criminalizing the right to free speech and dissent and those who choose to exercise it, which is exactly how fascism takes root. You also trivialize and dishonor the real meaning of anti-Semitism. How would you explain that to Taube and Abraham?
Dr. Sara Roy

No comments:

Post a Comment