-->
Let’s imagine something quite outlandish, that,
when Europeans first arrived in Canada to settle it, they turned out to be not
the ignorant and arrogant pricks entombed in their absurd religious notions who
unfortunately first set foot on this continent, but rather a cultivated,
thoughtful people, curious about those they discovered to be living here,
willing to accept and learn from them, and anxious to make their transition to
North America as peaceful and painless as possible.
Such a people would have
immediately spotted the remarkable fund of knowledge that the original
inhabitants had accumulated during their millenia as residents in the
unforgiving climate of Canada, and would, since they were a cultivated and
thoughtful people, have so arranged affairs as to make their own entry into
Canadian life such as to disturb the original inhabitants to the least possible
extent. This, of course, is just an idle dream, because the newcomers arrived
with their guns and weaponry, and their even more formidable array of
ignorance, intolerance and religious bigotry, which enabled them, against the
evident fact that they would have perished in the first winter without the help
of the indigenous inhabitants, to
conclude that they were in every way superior to the original inhabitants, who,
in the eyes of the newcomers, hardly merited the description of human beings at
all. Thus, instead of sending out parties to learn everything they could from
the First Nations, they sallied forth with the intention of tricking the
trusting locals into making deals under which the newcomers believed the locals
had virtually handed over to them their title to whichever of their lands the
newcomers might find valuable in pursuit of their grossly distorted system of
values.
All of this is more or
less in the realm of idle speculation since the Canadian attitudes towards
their indigenous people, and to their northern lands, has been that the
original inhabitants are simply to be moved around if the place they are living
might be needed for mining or some Euro-Canadian use, and (in relation to the
land) that it is okay to leave it in the hands of its original inhabitants until
such time as it might be needed by the invaders, at which point in past times the
people have been simply pushed aside, or, as in the modern context, they are
simply bought off, their acquiescence in whatever the invaders are proposing
being bought with money.
This is a sorry story,
and the only reason I have raised it in this form is because I read just this
week of a proposal to establish a Stewardship and Guardianship programme over a
plateau of 14,250 square kilometres of land in the neighbourhood of Great Slave Lake, the federal government working
with a local branch of the Dene people, who take their name from the river
Dehcho, the idea being to determine how best they can develop this land under
their own control, using their own qualities and capacities in doing so.
This sounds like
something very close to what I have always thought might have been tried across
the extent of Canada from the first, if only the European invaders had been of
a different, less aggressive and more thoughtful cast of mind. It has taken us
just over 400 years to get around to being more or less civilized.
Well, we are very close
to gathering the whirlwind from this past neglect, as one after another reports
by leading scientists tumble into our ken, revealing that we are getting very
close to the time at which the Earth will take no more abuse and begin to hit
us back.
A couple of days ago
when I was writing my previous Chronicle ( see Chronicle 94), I intended to
draw some severe attention to some additional items relevant to climate warming that have
recently come under more notice, but I got deflected on to one of my favorite
subjects, which is the remarkable environmental knowledge I discovered among
the few remaining hunters operating in the Canadian economy in the 1960s-70s.
So let’s get back to these recent revelations by our leading scientists as to exactly where we are in the fight to save our climate from deteriorating to such an extent that life as we know it today will scarcely be possible any more.
So let’s get back to these recent revelations by our leading scientists as to exactly where we are in the fight to save our climate from deteriorating to such an extent that life as we know it today will scarcely be possible any more.
I have touched on the
permafrost danger in Chronicle 93, but
just to recapitulate: it is reliably estimated that twice as much carbon is
locked into permanently frozen ground as has been emitted into the atmosphere
over millenia by human activities. And already permafrost across the global
north is already melting, with completely unforeseeable results. In Alaska they
are wondering why trees have suddenly taken on a surprising lean.
I have touched on the
alarming decline recently discovered in animal populations, which on average,
are said by the World Wildlife Fund to have declined 60 per cent in number,
since 1970. What is the likely end of this? Are we to be the only surviving
species on earth? If that is what our
climate-deniers have in mind, it seems assured that they are positing an
unsustainable future for us.
One after the other,
desperate tidings are staring us in the
face. Another report says that the oceans have been absorbing 60 per cent more
heat than was previously thought, which is why these waters are rapidly becoming
so acidic as to kill off marine life (e.g. the coral reefs). This report does
not just give us 12 years to shape up, as did the most recent report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These more recent investigators say that the
world must somehow or other thrash out a new deal for Nature in the next two
years or we humans could be en route to documenting our own extinction. So warns the United Nation’s biodiversity
chief, Cristiana Pașca
Palmer.
She is preparing us for
the major biodiversity conference to be held later in November in Egypt, and is
hoping for some spectacular result, at least equal to the Paris accord on the
global climate agreed by 194 nations in 2015. (This is one of the international
agreements from which the United States is threatening to withdraw.)
In a major article just
published in the journal Nature two scientists, James E. M. Watson and
James R. Allan, make clear the immense responsibility that rests on Canada in
this whole struggle to preserve the earth from the damaging effect of drastic
global warming.
They say
that 20 countries contain 94% of the world’s remaining wilderness (excluding
the high seas and Antarctica). More than 70% is in just five countries —
Russia, Canada, Australia, the United States and Brazil. Canada is the second
largest country on Earth, with huge areas of wilderness which these
authors say are central to hopes for the future of a biodiverse global
ecosystem. If this doesn’t put a huge responsibility on the shoulders of every
Canadian, given our small numbers compared with Russia and the United States, I
don’t know what would. “Thus,” write the authors, “the steps these nations take (or fail to
take) to limit the expansion of roads and shipping lanes, and to rein in
large-scale developments in mining, forestry, agriculture, aquaculture and
industrial fishing, will be critical.” (Editor’s note for Mr. Trudeau: they might
have added pipelines to this list.)
The coming conference in
Egypt, including as it does signatory nations to the Convention on
Biodiversity, intra-government organizations such as the admirable
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), non-government
organizations, and the scientific community, will be working towards planning
for the protection of biodiversity, and “We urge participants at the meeting to
include a mandated target for wilderness conservation. In our view, a bold yet
achievable target is to define and conserve 100% of all remaining intact
ecosystems.”
Get that, Canadians.
These international experts want every piece of wilderness in Canada to be
permanently protected from development. That should be almost possible if the public
gets behind it.
No comments:
Post a Comment