"Charles Dickens as he appears when reading." Illustration in Harper's Weekly, 7 December 1867. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Copy of a Photograph of Charles Dickens (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Ellen Ternan, the young actress who became Charles Dickens's mistress (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Ralph Fiennes |
I have always felt that one of the most difficult jobs for
any actor must be to portray a great man. Most men with the extraordinary
capacities they need to be considered “great” are indeed particular: they tend
not to be like other men, to have more curious personal characteristics, to
have more energy, more self-confidence, to just be more personally
interesting. I judge this on the handful
of great men I have met briefly (or have run across in my career as a
journalist): whether it was Pandit Nehru, Linus Pauling, the double winner of
the Nobel Prize, Jacques Tati, the inimitable French comedian, Richard Neutra,
the famous American architect, or Osip Zadkine, the Russian sculptor, each of
them had whatever they needed to make my work in interviewing them more or less
superfluous, the capacity to keep me interested while they just talked on and
on, and I listened, as if enchanted.
These reflections are prompted by a remarkable TV movie I
watched last night, a British production called The Invisible Woman about Charles Dickens’ young mistress, Ellen Ternan.
Although made for TV, this had all the qualities of
British theatre that I have always so much admired: magnificent acting, by
Ralph Fiennes as Dickens, Felicity Jones as Nelly, Kristin Scott Thomas as her
mother, and Joanna Scanlan in the difficult role of Dickens’ shamelessly put
upon wife; superb writing, which manages both to capture the raw energy of the
great man who was a powerhouse of invention, a repository of almost untameable
creative energy; and all of those
touches of genius in direction and production that one has become accustomed to
see when the British are really trying. Fiennes himself was the director, and
in one scene after another the sure touch of a director who knew his subject
backwards made the most of the exquisite sensitivity of the playing and
writing.
Ellen Ternan was the youngest of three sisters, all
actresses like their mother who, after the death of their father, had kept them
together as they struggled to make a living in the provincial theatre in the
mid-nineteenth century, taking whatever jobs came along, whether in farce,
drama, comedy or schlocky romance.
Dickens was an obsessive performer of his own works, so it
was natural that he ran across this family of young actresses. In addition he
was a man who apparently could hardly resist a pretty face. Woman were easy for
him to attract --- of course, he was known to everyone, lionized wherever he
went, praised and adulated to an unreasonable degree --- and there was
something about the quiet pure beauty of the young Nelly which attracted his immediate
attention. Her mother spotted his interest and worried that her daughter might
suffer from too close a connection. But she was in no position to forbid her
daughter from having anything to do with the great man, even though he was so
much older.
Dickens was a close friend of Wilkie Collins, who was living in a settled
relationship with a woman to whom he was not married, and when first Nelly
brushed up against this couple she bridled at the immorality of it.
She knew that Dickens was married and that his wife Catherine
had borne him ten children, who were always around. But eventually the great man made gestures to help the young actress and her
family, providing her with an apartment at his cost. She was reluctant, telling him on one
memorable occasion that she had not figured part of this bargain was that she
was to be his whore.
The portrayal of Mrs Dickens --- a plump, resigned figure
to whom Dickens appeared to pay scant respect --- by Joanna Scanlan, was one of
the central qualities of this film, and when Dickens insisted that his wife
should visit Miss Ternan to present her with a gift that had mistakenly been
delivered to his wife, the resulting scene, so tense and yet so understated,
laid out the profundity of the human drama between these three protagonists. Here I have to mention the delicacy of Ms. Abi
Morgan’s script. Mrs Dickens, who seemed to be used to her husband’s
peccadillos, quietly told the young girl that her husband might say he loved
her, but she would probably find that he loved his public more, a very
prescient judgment of the great man’s behaviour.
Eventually Nelly succumbed to his entreaties and agreed to
become his mistress, bearing him a still-born child, accompanying him on his
ceaseless journeys to read from his works, and on one occasion – that has
become famous in this now fairly well-known story --- being abandoned by him when they were
caught in a train wreck. The film shows Dickens as telling someone he was not
with this injured young woman, while demanding that attention be paid to her
injuries. He is said to have joined in the need for every hand to help with
those who were injured in the crash: this may, indeed, be the way it happened.
Claire Tomalin, on whose book this film was based, did a remarkable job of
research into this liaison, so I will take her word for it, although it is a
more sympathetic accounting of Dickens’ behaviour in this crisis than I had always believed took place.
Fiennes performance as Dickens is remarkable: there could
be no doubt from the way he acts that he was a great man, an unusual man, a
unique man, with exceptional qualities, good and bad, that had made him the
most admired writer of that era (or any other), a performance that caught his
obsessive vanity, his vulnerability while at the same time not ignoring that his
behaviour to those closest to him tended to be abominable.
This is a warts and all portrayal of one of England’s most
admired icons. One can believe that long after his death he continued to exert
a hold over the young woman who had given herself to him, though she was now
married and with a child of her own, restlessly walking the shore of Margate,
just as she had done with him, while trying to exorcise his ghost.
This TV production is a testament to one of the most
admirable achievements of English life: the high quality, not only of its
writers, past and present, but of the acting, direction and production of its
dramas.
No comments:
Post a Comment