Cover via Amazon |
Cover of Jackdaw Cake |
I gave the book back, and a few years later came across a
remaindered copy at a local W.H. Smith’s, but put it back, and moved on. Thereafter, I kept kicking myself for not
having bought it and it took me 20 years or more to find another copy, which I
now have. I was entranced by the book, (described by Julian Evans in his 2003 obituary
of Lewis as “a hauntingly comic memoir”) --- my memory of it being that
although Lewis found the behaviour of most of the Italians he met impossible,
he finished his year there with an undying love for them, for their attitudes
to life, and for everything to do with Italy and Italians.
Lewis, a self-made writer, died at the age of 95, and even
in his last decade he turned out five or six notable books dealing with the
travelling that had proven to be one of the purposes of his life.
Having read him with unalloyed delight for so many years, I
have to say I agree with the verdict of Julian Evans, who wrote on his death
that “his magnificent, exact rendering of
the world, in his mordant, civilised and generous prose, has no comparison.”
My friend
in Dubrovnik has a raft of his books in her library, and I have recently spent
a couple of weeks reading four of them that I had missed. They include the two
volumes of his autobiography, Jackdaw
Cake, published in 1985, and The
World, The World, published in 1996.
Although his
books describe the follies and cruelties of this world, as well as the
delights, he was seldom one to give way to indignation, something that seems to
have arisen from the peculiar nature of his childhood. His parents were
convinced spiritualists, and the section of his first autobiography under the
heading The Other Side, is probably the best description ever written of this
fake cult, that is believed and apparently practised by so many people. He
deals with such strange beliefs from time to time throughout his books, but if
he does not approve of them, he usually dismisses them gently with a word or
two, more or less in passing. In fact, he loved the odd things that people do,
and described in great detail many of
the weird customs of tribal people in India --- genuine indigenous people, of
whom there were when he was writing about them, some 55 million, a number that
is staggering when put alongside the surviving few hundred thousand of North
American tribal people. Though not
himself religious, Lewis accepted religious observances, especially those that
people had had passed down to them over the centuries, and he made it one of
his purposes in life to see things, places and people that he realized might
not last much longer, as modern life impinged on them, and shamelessly thrust
them aside or destroyed them.
Almost
the only real indignation he expressed
was confined to his description of the ruthless assault made on the native
tribes of Brazil, many of which were physically eliminated from the earth to
make way for loggers and miners, and cattle-men and others who wanted the lands
they lived on, and the trees and forests from which they had always obtained
their livelihoods. He made a special trip to Brazil in the late 1960s and
returned with a 12,500 word article that was published by The Sunday Times, and that aroused such a response as to lead to
the formation of Survival International, which by the 1996 existed in 65 countries
to defend the interests of tribal
peoples who are, as we know under pressure everywhere. Lewis, the most modest
of writers, permits himself to reprint a
statement by Survival International acknowledging the impact of his article ---
and he just leaves it at that.
He did,
however, also deplore the activities of what he casually, and repeatedly
describes as “the genocidal” American fundamentalist evangelists, some of whom
told him they weren’t concerned with the physical survival of the indigenous,
but only to ensure that they have accepted Jesus as their saviour before being
wiped from the face of the earth.
The range
of Norman Lewis’s books is quite amazing: he wrote about pre-modern Spain,
focusing on a fishing village, Farol, on the north-east coast, where he hoped he had found a place that
would guard him against the excesses of the modern industrial machine, only of
course to be disappointed. (His book on
that experience, one of his best, is called Voices
of the Old Sea.) He wrote about Burma, Indo-China, Haiti, Sicily (his book
on the mafia, The Honored Society, was accepted as the best description of that
organization available to Western readers), and Guatemala, which he says is the
most beautiful country he had ever seen, although brutalized by a succession of
American-supported strongmen who were untrammelled by any cncern for law or
justice.
He made
four trips to India, seeking out especially the tribal peoples who were under
such pressure from the modern Indian government, and still are apparently. In
this he describes with a dead-pan solemnity the many Indian customs that tie
them to their multiplicity of gods. The name of that book is A Goddess in the Stones, and he admits
in a later book (almost as an aside) that the particular goddess to whom every
obeisance had to be paid before undertaking a trip of any kind may have been
just a bundle of stones lying on the ground, but nevertheless, in the minds of
the custom-bound, caste-bound, tradition-bound Indians, that bundle of stones
contained the goddess Kali.
Though
himself not religious --- the training
he got in resisting the pressure he came under from his parents to accept
Spiritualism stood him in good stead --- nevertheless he was able to describe
in detail religious observances that he seemed to regard as precious simply
because they had been handed down through the centuries from person to person,
right until our present day. Whereas in
similar circumstances I would have been frothing at the mouth in indignation,
Norman was able to stand aside, more or less, at least enough to describe
things with an air of detachment and wonder.
It
occurred to me having read these four books, that he stood at the polar
opposite from John Pilger, an excellent
writer and remarkably courageoous
reporter, who froths with indignation in almost every line he writes. Norman
Lewis gets perhaps the same result, yet he remains always a quiet, almost invisible presence. (In fact,
one of his self-deprecating jokes was that he was the only person he knew who
could walk into a room and leave
it half an hour later without anyone else in the room knowing he had been
there.)
He is that kind of a writer, too, which perhaps accounts for
his not having ever become as well-known abroad as he was in England, swhere
such good judges as Graham Greene considered him one of the finest writers of
the twentieth-century, and, in one famously, much-quoted quip, Auberon Waugh,
who said he was “outstandingly the best
travel writer of our age, if not since Marco Polo.”
If anyone is interested in embarking on an examination of
his work, he can be found on the Internet, and his books are, for the most
part, still easily available.
Thank-you for your post on Norman Lewis - an under-appreciated writer. I liked your observations about the breadth of his writing.
ReplyDelete