Wednesday, January 3, 2018

My Log 572 Jan 3 2018: Chronicles from (almost) the Tenth Decade: 9; The teenage confessions of “a born skirter”; someone who never faced up to his own woeful ignorance about sex

On New Year’s Day I published in the seventh of these Chronicles an account of my family, and the various pressures we have lived through since the day of my marriage 67 years ago. I expected a stronger reaction from my four children than I received, but my youngest son, Thom, made up for the indifference of the rest. While apparently appreciating the piece, he said it contained enough material for five novels, and described me as “a  born skirter”, by which I took it he meant I have always had a tendency to skirt around personal issues, rather than confront them head on. Indeed, he told me the other day it was like pulling teeth to get me to talk about my personal life.
I cannot deny this, have, in fact, written quite a bit about it in previous efforts along the same lines as these Chronicles, which have remained hidden away, in the classic formulation, in various drawers. So I am happy to use this opportunity to try to explain why or how I grew up as I did.
I have tended to put the responsibility on having been brought up in a society of Scottish origin, heavily influenced by Presbyterian mores and within that, in a family not given at all to expressing its emotions, except in regard to their conduct of the family business, in which I never had any interest. My mother, in particular, was a censorious woman, who hated alcohol that she would never allow into the house, and always had a “hands off” attitude towards any mention of sex. In fact, I never remember discussing the subject with her or my father.

1. Shy, teased, and entranced
I was brought up in a small village called Wyndham, out on the plain, a distribution centre for farmers. The youngest of five sons, my memory tells me I was mercilessly and continuously teased, especially about girls, and that this had a devastating effect on the rest of my life. (This could be an over-dramatization of what actually happened: any teasing seems like a monstrous thing to a small boy)
At Wyndham primary school I was so entranced by a five-year-old called Dulcie that I tried to ride her pony and fell off into a gooseberry bush to ignominious laughter from the mob. My brothers were ready around the family dining table to pillory me as the most disgusting of  libertines, and thereafter, at the very mention of Dulcie, or any other girl, I would blush to the roots of my hair, giving the mob their sign to move in.

   2. I become a city kid
We moved to the nearby city of   Invercargill when I was seven, and I became enmeshed in the all-male world inhabited by one of my games-playing brothers. When I was still in elementary school I developed the habit of going to the evening practices of the High School Old Boys cricket team, of which my 
brother was a member. They treated me very well, giving me a bat every few nights, and I developed a fanatic interest in the game of cricket, whose history I began to study, and whose great players I adored. When other kids were making normal friendships with girls, I was totally absorbed in cricket, and because girls were a taboo subject (unless I wanted to be deeply embarrassed) I developed a belief that it was less than manly to have anything to do with them.
At the same time, when I played tennis at the local clubs (which we were allowed to do without charge) I found myself in the company of girls from my primary school, who pranced around in their shorts, exhibiting their legs in a fashion that, even at their age, was never anything but totally self-aware. The particular girl I fancied was called June. I was always ready to put up with her pathetic feminine waving at the ball and giggling because I was so entranced by her legs. She was naturally flirtatious and one day we climbed into the loft at the tennis club pavilion. I felt I had been drawn there by an act of her will. We sat in the confined space and I put my arm around her, felt the flesh of her upper leg intoxicatingly against my hand, leaned over and kissed her briefly on the lips before she drew suddenly away with a giggle and began to scramble for the ladder.  Christ I was an innocent! It was the first time I had ever kissed anyone except my mother and I couldn’t even remember that. I was to daydream about kissing June for months after.
This was not exactly a normal, or even healthy way to approach women.  I didn’t embrace them as playmates: I became an entranced observer of their bodies. In the process I became  always a sucker for a good-looking woman, a habit that stayed with me throughout my life, and led to much stress, and even trauma. As well as pleasure.

3. First time in long pants as Wyndham joins yet another war
My first clear memory of my second decade involved a return to Wyndham for a ceremonial occasion in the Town Hall, a building next to my Uncle Ossie’s elegant white wooden house that stood in a huge and bountiful garden, and which stood cross the road from that wonderland, his old-fashioned general country store, in which I spent days when on holiday each year. The occasion was to farewell some boys who had enlisted for the Second World War. I remember it particularly because it was the first time I had ever worn long pants. I was covered in confusion and shame to be seen dressed up so by the whole village.
Wyndham had been founded in 1869 under a flurry of patriotism for the Empire, getting its name from Sir Ash Windham, a military hero of the Crimean war, who was credited by The Times correspondent on the spot with being the only leader to put some oomph into the battle, with the result that all Wyndham’s  streets were named after events in that war. We had lived on Redan street, which led into Balaclava, Alma, Inkerman, Nightingale and so on. Like most villages in New Zealand, the village had given its handful of young men to go as soldiers to the Boer war, and, of course, to the First World War, so these recruits of 1940 were stepping into a well-worn tradition, although, with hindsight, one might well ask why the hell such boys, living in this rustic backwater, should ever have been required to go to South Africa to fight the Empire’s unjust and unnecessary wars.
The animosity that I remember being shown in my family against Joe Louis when he first fought Max Schmeling, had obviously been replaced with animosity against Adolf Hitler and his Nazis, and the New Zealand Prime Minister, the well-loved socialist Michael Joseph Savage had declared, in the first days after Hitler’s attack on Poland,  “Where Britain stands, we stand,” (What a statement! Did Britain stand by New Zealand twenty years later when they decided they could make more money by joining the European Community? No, of course not--- they ruthlessly cut New Zealand loose).  From that moment few if any voices were raised in New Zealand against participation in this greater and, I guess, more justifiable war.

4. I get a girl friend at last, amid persistent blushes
At high school I blossomed as an athlete, and games became my preoccupation.  When I arrived at high school I was astonished to find that all the strong, athletic, admired boys of the upper classes were enthusiastically going to city dances at the weekends, a pastime I considered beneath me. I never did learn to dance, but it wasn’t because I had no interest in girls. On the contrary, I was secretly obsessed with them, but, I guess, afraid to get too close to them. I got into the habit of going along the street to play tennis with a family who had their own private court, and who were always in search of a fourth player for doubles every weekend. The men they gathered for the game were older, but I could more than hold my own with them on the court. The family in question had three children, a son and two daughters, and although they were Roman Catholics (and by that very adherence earned the disapproval of my mother) and went to the Marist network of confessional schools, I became very friendly with all of them. The boy, a year or so younger than me, was a brilliant swimmer, at one point won a New Zealand title for schoolboys, and later in life (much to my surprise) became a priest. The younger girl was the better-looking of the two: in fact, she was a raving beauty, but she was unathletic, and seemed to have no interest in a jock like me. Her sister, however, was a different kettle of fish, as we used to say, a sophisticated, voluptuous girl, a good tennis and table tennis player, and a born flirt.
Pretty soon I was going along in midweek to play table tennis with this girl almost every evening, which we did in a room we had to ourselves, interrupted occasionally by lightning visits from her father. Between games we sat on a large, comfortable sofa, eventually necking and spooning, from which, in the event of one of Dad’s surprise visits, we usually managed to recover sufficient decorum to pass muster.  It would be good to be able to say that one thing led to another, but it never did, my hands never strayed into forbidden regions of her extremely desirable body, a true measure of my innocence well into my late teens. I preferred to drive myself into paroxysms of desire, rather than to actually do anything, a recipe for entry into Masturbation Heaven.
Eventually it was accepted that she was my girl-friend, and we went to movies together at weekends. When that became known at school, one of the cheekiest of my teachers, who was very friendly with me because we worked together on putting out a little newspaper about the school’s news, would make veiled jokes in class about behaviours that might be expected from someone “who lived like you live”, bringing me to such mortifying embarrassments that I would be overcome with intense, guilt-ridden  blushing. Olive, older than me, had already left school, had plunged into a life where a mere schoolboy could not follow, and our relationship withered and died, perhaps because her family was no more favorable to the idea of their daughter’s connection with a Protestant than my mother was to my friendship with a gang of Catholics.
Although our society was relatively free of racial prejudices (perhaps because our community was so homogeneous; even Joe Louis eventually became a hero, when he knocked out the German Schmeling), ours was a city in which Catholic-Protestant antagonisms were as lively as a ferret, and just as ferocious.

5. Where did this Presbyterian sense of guilt come from?

Two or three years later, in my late teens, when I had left school,  I was at the seaside and found myself wandering along the shore with June’s old friend Anne. Somehow we’d got separated from the people we’d come with, and afterwards I wondered if I had been responsible for that, or whether perhaps Anne had plotted it. Anne had been Ron’s girlfriend for as long as anyone could remember, and it was taken for granted they would marry. I was already seventeen and still devoid of the least sexual experience but I imagined she must have had plenty. She certainly the prettiest girl I had ever been alone with. She had a sharp sculptured face, narrow eyebrows that looked like they might have been plucked the way the film stars did it (a powerful symbol of sophistication beyond anything I was familiar with), her skin glowed and her body was lithe and emanated a powerful sexuality. In the dunes among the cutty-grass she suggested we sit down to rest, and before I knew what was happening, she was lying on top of me and I was kissing her furiously. We stayed there kissing all afternoon and when we stood up I found that the half of my body that had been in the sun was burnt, whereas the other half had been sheltered by her body lying on mine and was still pale. As we stood up I said, “What about Ron?” She answered, “don’t worry about Ron.” I can’t remember what happened when we rejoined the others or even after we got back to town,  except that Anne dumped Ron, who was devastated.
Anne became my first real girlfriend, throwing away Ron and his business opportunities and assured wealth, for this guy who was just a cub reporter on the local newspaper. Though so pretty and with such a powerful sexual attraction, Anne was a one-man woman from that moment and I imagined myself envied by everyone. We went to the movies on Saturday nights and I went round to her home and we played table tennis and in between games lay on the couch kissing. Everywhere we went we found places where we could kiss without people  seeing us but she didn’t want to go any further and, although I never formulated this as a thought, I realized years later that I carried within me during all these years until my marriage, a feeling that there was something wrong about going further. My imagination was inflamed but I was able to contain myself because every night in bed I was active and eventually lay exhausted and panting. I hoped to hell my brothers didn’t suspect me or my mother didn’t find anything in the bed. It was a vile thing to do, I believed that (another proof of my innocence), but I couldn’t stop myself.
When my mum and dad went to England on holiday I went with Anne on holiday to nearby Stewart Island. We took separate rooms in a boarding house. I got a letter from my sister who had found out we were together and expressed her shock, but that didn’t bother me, since my sister had developed into a busybody, catching it from our censorious mother. Out in the countryside lying beside the lake we fiddled around but never dared to go too far. One day Anne opened up her legs to me and I thrust my inflamed cock into that spot for a few seconds, then withdrew it quickly, terrified of what I might leave behind. I didn’t know anything about what happened when someone lost her virginity, and I had no idea  whether she was a virgin or not and it wasn’t of any interest to me. So what if someone else had been there before me? She was beautiful and everyone must have wanted her.
After a few days Anne had to go back to the city to work. But a girl arrived from Dunedin, Frances, and after walking out with her a couple of times, I timidly kissed her and she consented, giggling. She was not beautiful like Anne; she was larger and brainier and had soft flesh and a soft voice. But she was more proper than Anne, and suffered from the customary nervousness about sex and I didn’t try anything before taking off for home. I never mentioned Frances to Anne, which, later in life, developed into a habit.
After a year I got a job on a paper in Dunedin and took off protesting my undying love for Anne. A month later my sister wrote me to report she’d heard that Anne had been carried out of a party by some young buck who turned out to be the farmer she eventually married.
The last episode was a ludicrous phone call I made to her in which she poured over me a bath of bromides about the various stages of young love, the moral of which was that I had missed the boat. Not that I really cared.
*                *  
This was the sum total of my sexual experience and sexual knowledge when I ventured into marriage at the age of 22. My marriage occurred after an exchange of frenzied, passionate letters across the 1,000-mile length of the country. Not much wonder my poor wife eventually found that I was not the man she thought she had married. For really, she knew little about the real me, who always guarded so closely the facts of my ignorance and inexperience.









Tuesday, January 2, 2018

My Log 571 Jan 2 2018: Chronicles from (almost) the Tenth Decade: 8 I’m hanging in with my love of sports; but I will be glad if, as suggested, the influence of money in our games has peaked and will diminish henceforth

A writer in the weekend newspapers has made a suggestion in a subject close to my heart, that leaves me between two stools: whether to accept and embrace his suggestion, or to denounce it, root and branch.
The subject is sports, a subject I have taken a devoted interest in ever since I was a small boy. Indeed my enthusiasm for sports is regarded by my family and my diminishing circle of friends as so eccentric as to allow them to question my very sanity.
I understand their outrage. After all, according to all my political beliefs, I should abhor sport as nothing but the opiate of the masses, a distraction designed by those who govern us to divert the voters from paying serious attention to the iniquities of their governance. I really can’t argue against that: it is true. And yet, I have always loved sport. My bedroom wall was covered with photos of every All Black Rugby team since 1905; as a kid I spent my every waking hour hitting a ball  --- almost any kind of ball --- back and forth against the wall, or playing pretend games of golf in the backyard, in which narrow victories were always won by R.H. Glading, our national champion, beating off Bobby Locke, Ben Hogan and other legendary figures of the game; in my first year as a journalist I wrote mostly about sports; by the time I was 19 I knew more about the history of cricket and Rugby than about any other subject. I could recite the winner of Wimbledon for decades back;  had read every book written on the sainted game --- cricket, of course ---  and spent much time wondering whether the 232 made by Stan McCabe for Australia at Trent Bridge,  Nottingham in 1938, reputed to be the greatest innings of the modern era, could really have been superior to the many graceful  innings of Victor Trumper 30 years before, innings so fine that the great W.G. Grace presented him with his bat, as “the old  champion to the new champion”, surely the ultimate accolade in all of cricket history.
Here is how Neville Cardus, at the same time both the music critic and cricket reporter for the Manchester Guardian, described McCabe’s innings:
     Now came death and glory, brilliance wearing the dress of culture. McCabe demolished the English attack with aristocratic politeness, good taste and reserve. He cut and drove, upright and lissome; his perfection of touch moved the aesthetic sense; this was the cricket of felicity, power and no covetousness, strength and no brutality, assault and no battery, dazzling strokes and no rhetoric; lovely brave batsmanship, giving joy to the connoisseur…One of the greatest innings ever seen anywhere in any period…he is in the line of Trumper and no other batsman today but McCabe has inherited Trumper’s sword and cloak.”

I even gloried in the overblown prose, challenging any other sport to match it. Cardus, after all, was just one of many intellectual Englishmen who have graced the great game with their poetry.
So, okay, that’s just to tell you my take on sports as introduction to what Cathal Kelly, a sportswriter for the Globe and Mail suggested on Saturday.  “…mainstream sports,” he wrote, “…may still be all things to all people, but they can no longer be the same thing to everyone. The binding power of sport is fracturing. Without the ability to bring people together, the games we play begin to seem what they are --- a distraction from actual problems…. this is the crest of the hill, when a thing is running on inertia rather than its own power. We’ve reached peak sports.”
He introduces the subject by way of Trump and his attack on football players who kneel for the national anthem, but he goes on with a more interesting analysis. The huge sums of money that have come to dominate the big leagues in all major sports come from TV deals. The owners, on to a good thing, have pressed for more and more of it. “Twenty years ago, the NFL was a one-day-a-week thing….Now it is an every day thing.” .And if there are no games there are still plenty of channels “force-feeding you with a lot of screaming about the football you’ve already watched.”  Nevertheless, viewership is on a slide that shows no sign of diminishing, and in his search for reasons, he comes upon saturation. “Football has become the equivalent of living in a pizza parlour. Pizza is great…but some nights you are going to want to go out for some Indian, or pick up some leafy greens instead.” And having overcome their over-indulgence, these people are not likely to return to it.
He further suggests we are in a new age, in which people don’t want to wait for what they want to see: they like to have it right there when they are ready to watch it.  This is a demand that sports cannot meet. But people may continue to watch in a way that does not boost league revenues, like  watching clips on Instagram, or arguing about the big catch on Redditt.
In other words we are suffering from a surfeit of sports, and we have reached our peak, from which only a decline can be predicted, writes Mr. Kelly.  Taking the NHL as an example, he says they have stretched their playoff games to two months from six weeks thirty years ago, and, “ if the NHL could figure out a way to sell it, Game 7 of the Stanley Cup final would be played 24 hours before the start of the next season.”
In the old days when I was a kid following Wimbledon, we followed the top players as they battled each other in a few big tournaments a year. They did not go round playing against the same players over and over all year. In the days of Jesse Owens, Fanny Blankers-Koen, Herb Elliott, Roger Bannister,  Mel Whitfield, and Peter Snell, the Olympics were won by athletes with ordinary day jobs. It was even said of the incomparable Don Bradman, the greatest scoring machine in the history of cricket, that before embarking on one of his freak innings at 11 am, he would go to his office and put in an hour or two of ordinary work that needed to be done.
This was the spirit of the Rugby I adored as a youngster: the heroes were guys who lived in the neighbouring streets and hung out with my brothers between games for the All Blacks. Though there has always been a professional element in English cricket, I can still remember when the first professional cricketer was hired in New
Zealand in what must have been the late 1940s.
One after the other, the amateur games turned professional, especially those that slowly had became false-amateurs living on exaggerated expenses. I was present at the first open Wimbledon, in 1968.  I remember  Rod Laver playing Ken Rosewall: Rosewall was playing wonderfully but Laver was thrashing him. At that tournament I will never forget the great Pancho Gonzales, 40 years of age and at the end of a career that had always been professional, winning the doubles title with something unheard of in those days: four aces in the final game.
Yet even though sports is no longer played under the rubric that I learned at high school, “the game before the prize”, I still to his day am fascinated by the struggle to win, the poetry and glory of the stylishness and technical mastery, whether of running --- think of Almaz Ayana’s beautiful 10,000 metre world record at the last Olympics --- or the grace of movement, Roger Federer’s glorious one-handed backhand sweeping everything before it. And allow me to think of the All Blacks winning the last World Cup, as The Guardian commented, “play(ing) at a level few teams in the history of the game have reached.” And after it was all over, their coach Steve Hansen who had insisted all along that they wanted to play the game as it should be played, in its full artistry and power, saying how pleased he was by the kind of game they had played. He went on to say that, after all, even if they had lost, “it was still only a game.”
That made me proud to have been their supporter all along, unhappy when they lost, but always ready to reflect that, after all, “it’s only a game.”
That spirit is what has been almost lost with the advent of big money into sports. And finally I have to conclude it is probably good if that influence of money, especially of big money, is to be diminished in future.









Monday, January 1, 2018

My Log 570 Jan 1 2018: Chronicles from (almost) the Tenth Decade, 7: The advantage --- flexibility --- and disadvantage --- isolation --- of a perfectly nuclear family

 My wife and I were married in the simplest possible church ceremony on June 9, 1950 in Dunedin, New Zealand. Within two weeks we had taken off from the country as so many young people did in those days, “ to see the world”, a voyage from which, basically, we never returned. In doing so, we not only cut ourselves off from our families, though family is supposed to be the basic unit of society; but we also sentenced our own family, when we gathered one, to a very strange upbringing. Our four children have known nothing of grandparents from either side of the family, have had no relatives within tens of thousands of miles, and, since we kept moving from one country to another, one city to another, one dwelling place or habitation to another, they have never had a chance to decide where they are from, or where they feel most “at home.”
         I never gave much thought to that over the years, but one day my eldest son said, “Do you realize, Dad, I never went to any school for more than two years?”  I said, no, I hadn’t realized that. Then more recently, my youngest son mentioned that he had grown up in this curiously unnatural world in which our family --- which I always had posited as the perfectly nuclear family, free from cloying entanglements --- existed. He had understood that he had missed something in life, and that I was responsible for it. Of course, he was right.
We had had a church wedding only to please the mothers, both religiously inclined, while we were both atheists who wanted nothing to do with church. After all, we figured, we’re leaving almost straight away.
We had fallen in love through an exchange of letters that went rushing from one end of New Zealand to the other, eventually every day, and which laid the basis for our lifelong friendship.  Eight years after we were married, my wife discovered I was not really the man she thought she had married. Our lives would have been easier if she had been able to accept me as I really was (and am), but she never had that forgiveness in her, and her bitterness grew during the 56 years we were together until it took over in her later years. I could not, and do not, blame her for it: she was  provoked, and I was sorry to have been the agent of her provocation.
As for our family, living in splendid isolation from a society around them that was forever changing because of our peripatetic lifestyle, I always looked on the bright side, and figured that the continual changes were valuable experiences for them. Our three sons were born in England, and brought up in a crowded apartment with three fairly large rooms around which they were able to ride their tricycle with abandon, scuffing the hell out of the sideboards. They had just started school when I was transferred back to home office in Montreal, a change I decided to accept because we had lost the taste for returning to New Zealand, and the class-consciousness of British society did not win our hearts. We lived in South Kensington, a toney Tory area of London, which I was able to afford only because the company paid the stiff key money for our apartment. That paid, the weekly rent was ridiculously low. In South Kensington even the state-run schools were of a high standard, and our eldest, Ben, who was seven when we left England, had learned to read as if by osmosis, thanks to a sterling little Welsh girl, Miss Thomas, who taught him to read so effortlessly that he didn’t even know he was learning the skill. That became the basis of his voracious reading habit in life, and also became the basis of my confidence that I didn’t need to worry about Ben because he had the capacity to pick up any subject or profession that interested him. He picked up a guitar at 13 and thereafter playing it was all he wanted to do.
The two younger boys were just getting going through nursery schools: the second, Robert, was gaining confidence after a rough beginning in a London County Council shelter from which we adopted him at the age of 11 weeks (he is now a criminal lawyer), and the younger, Thom, gave an early indication of nervous caution when faced with enrolling in one of England’s best nursery schools: for six weeks he stood with his mother, his arms folded, watching the other kids play before being persuaded he could join in (he is now a screenwriter).
During these seven years in which the three boys grew out of  infancy, it was their mother, who had stopped working in order to care for them, who gave them that basic sense of security that children need when so young.  I was usually occupied with work, quite often away, but I would read them a story most nights, occasionally rock them to sleep when they awoke during the night, drive them to school most mornings,  and try give them happy holidays each summer, camping in France. I had started out not caring whether we had children or not, an opinion that changed immediately they arrived.  I became closely attached to them all, and it was that, my inability to leave them, which held our family together during some rocky times in London, for the rockiness of which I take full responsibility.
Of course we developed some of the characteristics of the solitary nuclear family while in London, where apartment-dwellers in South Kensington could hardly expect to make many acquaintances. But we did strike up one friendship with a London journalist and his family which resulted in our taking our boys, and their two twins of the same age, on a holiday in Spain. This was a fairly momentous event for me, because until then I had always honoured the unwritten rule that fascist Spain did not deserve our custom.
When we finally clambered aboard the Alexander Pushkin for the return journey to Montreal we headed into a social situation tailor-made for our isolated nuclear family. We bought a house in Outremont, in a row of houses occupied by French-Canadian families, whose children --- one of whose first acts was to throw a rock through our basement window ---- were going to the neighbourhood French schools, and right opposite an orthodox Jewish family whose three children, of the same age as ours, were hustled off to their own confessional schools, and who were never seen on the street to play. It struck me this was a system perfectly designed to bring up children who would become suspicious of “the others.” Because it seemed like the politically sensible thing to do, we tried to enrol our children in the nearest French-language school, designed in those days for French-speaking and Roman Catholic students, and we found that these classifications were so closely adhered to that not only did they refuse to take our kids, but, they had also refused to take the children of some Moroccan Jewish families who lived in the neighbourhood, even though they were already French-speaking. This was the behaviour of the old-style, pure laine Church-ridden Quebecois, but they were already under heavy pressure to make way for students who would have to be taught French before they could be taught anything else. This was something English-language schools in Canada had always done.
When we enrolled the kids in the English school, we found that something (I hope my memory is accurate here) like 53 per cent of the students were Greek-speaking, some 20 per cent were Chinese, 17 per cent Moroccan Jews, and only 10 per cent came from English language homes. I got on to the parent/teacher committee, but I lost my enthusiasm when I discovered that the Greek parents believed their children would get a good education only if they were repeatedly beaten over the head. I quit, and we took the children out of school, so that Shirley, an expert teacher, could teach them at home.
The next year we applied to the French school again, and our three children were accepted, along with three children from a similarly adventurous English family. The children were put into the back of the classroom and forgotten about; our youngest came home raging, day after day, “I hate that shrimpy fuckin’ nun,” an adequate comment on the standard of their teaching, I thought.   The children did learn French, but from the children in the playground. It was a tough experience for our kids and I have felt conflicted about it ever since: I put them there as a more or less political decision, but they have had to pay the price, and it is one thing for which I don’t think they can have yet forgiven me.
I lived in England for eleven years without ever feeling at home; I lived in Canada for thirteen years without ever thinking I belonged, so I was receptive when my wife, who was suffering from post-menopausal problems, as it turned out, began to express a homesickness for New Zealand. Okay, I said, why not? So we sold up the two homes we owned in Montreal --- one a cabin 40 miles north of the city --- and took off.
Perhaps the result of that supreme act of foolishness is the subject for another Chronicle. Suffice to say that I didn’t feel at home in New Zealand any more, so when we returned eighteen months later --- having spent everything we had saved during twenty-five years of wandering --- I began to feel that here must be where I was destined to stay.
One thing, however, remains to be said about the children: they all regard their eighteen months in New Zealand as the peak experience of their childhood. They loved it. They loved the relaxed schools with their matey relationship with their teachers. They loved their uncle with his beautiful farm in the high country and the four-wheelers they could zip around in. I think they even enjoyed the whole experience of feeling that they belonged to a wider family that were now real people.
The only problem was --- those wandering parents of theirs, always ready to move somewhere else, who bundled them up for one last trip across the oceans, back to Canada.
And yet, this one thing has always stuck with me from this experience: my son Ben was an outsider among the English kids whose toffee-nosed accent he adopted, but he assimilated; he was an outsider among his French high school classsmates, where he became for a time a young  Quebec separatist, fully assimilated; he assimilated like a blotting paper does ink, taking in the whole New Zealand ethos, language, attitude, humour, the whole package; and finally, although for a while  professing his intention to return to New Zealand, he has settled into becoming --- well, not exactly a regular Canadian. He went down to Austin, Texas, to form a rock and roll band, and he loves it there, just as he has loved every city he has ever lived in.
How about that, you’all?